Responding
to the Horror
By
David Chandler
As
of this writing the information on the Iraqi torture scandal is
that the
torture was intentionally orchestrated from high levels in the military
and the administration as part of a clumsy and illegal intelligence
gathering effort, [see
also a more recent article from the Guardian] that it was
widespread, that it
has resulted in the deaths of some prisoners, that the
International Committee of the Red Cross has been reporting on the
problem to US authorities over the past year, and that similar
things have been going on at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere. (See
our website for references to all of these facts.)
None of this
is news to the Arab world. They have known about it all along because
they have believed their own friends and family members who have
experienced it. It is news only in that undeniable evidence has
leaked out to the American public. (That puts it in the same category
as the notorious "Secret Bombing of Cambodia" in the Vietnam
war
not a secret to the Cambodians
not a secret to
the North Vietnamese
only a secret from the US Congress and
the American public.) The quibbling over whether torture should
be called torture, or something less distasteful, or whether our
torture is as bad as Saddam's torture, has descended to the level
of defining what "is" is. Just for the record, the techniques
that were used at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere do
in fact fit the generally accepted definition of torture.
George W. Bush
acts "shocked...shocked" that torture is going on in one
of our prisons. But if his hands are so clean, why did his administration
invent the phony term "enemy combatant" (a term with no
meaning in international law) to rationalize its violation of the
Geneva Convention's requirement that prisoners of war (which is
what they actually are) be treated humanely? Why would we even consider
inhumane treatment of prisoners, regardless of their status? Our
prisons should be examples to the world of the way things ought
to be. Anything less is an invitation for our own soldiers to be
treated cruelly. Why do we maintain the prisons for these so-called
"enemy combatants" outside the jurisdiction of US laws
in Guantanamo Bay Cuba and Central Asia? Why are the names of the
prisoners kept secret, even from their own families? Why are they
denied any kind of due process to determine whether we "got
the right guys" and to verify for the world to see that we
have a legitimate right to hold them?
My most fundamental
question is why does this nation, which holds itself up as the beacon
of morality in the world, refuse to ratify the UN
Convention Against Torture? This convention prohibits "cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment" including "severe
pain or suffering, whether physical or mental." It has been
signed by most of our allies, but it should be signed by every nation
on earth, with the United States at the head of the list!
Isn't the bottom-line
reason most people supported the war against Iraq, even when all
the phony reasons had been exposed, is that Saddam Hussein was a
cruel dictator? I believe most Americans are truly appalled by human
cruelty, but if we don't hold our own government accountable to
the same moral standards we apply to others the blame falls on us.
Why am I ranting
on like this? Do I hate America? No. I am a big supporter of "liberty
and justice for all". I would like to see America live up to
the values it purports to be about. We will never do that if we
remain willfully ignorant of what is being done in our name around
the world. If we pretend our own country is somehow sacrosanct and
blind ourselves to its failings we are committing national idolatry.
With the wide availability of the Internet you can read practically
any newspaper in the world in English. We don't have to accept the
propaganda we are fed by this (or any) administration through a
compliant media. As someone said on the radio today, "We are
as ignorant as we choose to be."
See progressivewritersbloc.com
for all of our articles supplemented with links to background and
documentation of the central facts cited in them. We
also have there links to a wide range of English language news sources
from around the world.
|